<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Strasbourg Observers</provider_name><provider_url>https://strasbourg.weichie.dev</provider_url><author_name>Guest Blogger</author_name><author_url>https://strasbourg.weichie.dev/author/stijnsmet/</author_url><title>Scoppola v. Italy (no. 3): The Grand Chamber faces the &#x201C;constitutional justice vs. individual justice&#x201D; dilemma (but it doesn&#x2019;t tell) - Strasbourg Observers</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;a href="https://strasbourg.weichie.dev/2012/06/20/scoppola-v-italy-no-3-the-grand-chamber-faces-the-constitutional-justice-vs-individual-justice-dilemma-but-it-doesnt-tell/"&gt;Scoppola  v. Italy (no. 3): The Grand Chamber faces the &#x201C;constitutional justice vs. individual justice&#x201D; dilemma (but it doesn&#x2019;t tell)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;script type='text/javascript'&gt;
&lt;!--//--&gt;&lt;![CDATA[//&gt;&lt;!--
		/*! This file is auto-generated */
		!function(c,d){"use strict";var e=!1,n=!1;if(d.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},!c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage)if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(t)if(t.secret||t.message||t.value)if(!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var r,a,i,s=d.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),n=d.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=0;o&lt;n.length;o++)n[o].style.display="none";for(o=0;o&lt;s.length;o++)if(r=s[o],e.source===r.contentWindow){if(r.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message){if(1e3&lt;(i=parseInt(t.value,10)))i=1e3;else if(~~i&lt;200)i=200;r.height=i}if("link"===t.message)if(a=d.createElement("a"),i=d.createElement("a"),a.href=r.getAttribute("src"),i.href=t.value,i.host===a.host)if(d.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener("message",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),d.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",t,!1),c.addEventListener("load",t,!1);function t(){if(!n){n=!0;for(var e,t,r=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE 10"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(/Trident.*rv:11\./),i=d.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),s=0;s&lt;i.length;s++){if(!(e=i[s]).getAttribute("data-secret"))t=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t);if(r||a)(t=e.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute("security"),e.parentNode.replaceChild(t,e)}}}}(window,document);
//--&gt;&lt;!]]&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://strasbourg.weichie.dev/2012/06/20/scoppola-v-italy-no-3-the-grand-chamber-faces-the-constitutional-justice-vs-individual-justice-dilemma-but-it-doesnt-tell/embed/" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Scoppola  v. Italy (no. 3): The Grand Chamber faces the &#x201C;constitutional justice vs. individual justice&#x201D; dilemma (but it doesn&#x2019;t tell)&#x201D; &#x2014; Strasbourg Observers" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><description>This guest post was written by Cesare Pitea, Researcher in International Law (Faculty of Law) and Assistant Professor of Interational Law (Faculty of Political Science), University of Parma (Italy). 1.&#xA0;&#xA0;&#xA0;&#xA0;&#xA0;&#xA0; Judging in a Heated Political Context In the Scoppola&#xA0; v. Italy (no. 3) judgment ([GC], no. 126/05, 22 May 2012), &#xA0;the third chapter of the [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
